Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly

Twombly took legal action against Bell Atlantic for the alleged infringement of the Sherman Antitrust Act. According to Twombly's argument, Mr. Twombly asserted that any companies established as the result of the division of AT&T ensured that there were be no hindrances imposed upon competitors: that no single company would impede another telephony company from fairly participating in the market. This Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly case is based on the previously established 1996 Telecommunications Act: an act that permitted smaller companies to compete in a market that was formerly monopolized by regionally established companies. In essence, the Act called for incumbent local exchange carriers to give competitive local exchange carriers the chance to obtain networks at acceptable prices.

Twombly asserted that there was a plan in place to preclude the competitive local exchange carriers from taking part in the market and stated that such acts were a conspiracy that falls under section one of the Sherman Act. The District court found the allegations made by Twombly conclusory because the allegations did not directly define precisely how the incumbent local exchange carriers were working together to preclude their competitors from the market.

The case was at first dismissed by the District Court, and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals later reversed the decision. In May of 2007, the United States Supreme Court overturned the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision; the Supreme Court ruling declared that Twombly must have a more explicit and detailed assertion of conspiracy.

Click here to learn more about Debra Wabnik of Simmons, Jannace & Stagg